This website is dedicated to the review of many popular Amazon products. We are sure that the information on this website will be helpful. Hopefully this information will improve your buying decisions on Amazon. Bookmark this website and return often for the latest updates. Feel free to leave comments.
Showing posts with label Sports. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sports. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Polar RS300X Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Sports) recently tagged "running"

57 of 60 people found the following review helpful: 3.0 out of 5 stars Overall a decent product with some minor drawbacks, August 28, 2009 This review is from: Polar RS300X Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Sports) For some reason, Polar requires that these units be sent back to replace the battery, which costs $25 + shipping. On top of the annual cost of maintenance, this ship to replace policy leaves you without a heart monitor for about 2 weeks once a year.

The other issue I found is that the reception range is not very good, so the unit won't work well mounted on a bicycle.

Finally, Polar has decided to arbitrarily remove the % fat burn function from some of its watches. This watch does not have it, so keep in mind you will not know what % of your calorie burn was fat.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 
31 of 32 people found the following review helpful: 2.0 out of 5 stars Electronics OK, crappy display, September 6, 2009 This review is from: Polar RS300X Heart Rate Monitor Watch (Sports) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UPDATE: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 1:36PM

After a couple more workouts and a few hours of trying to figure out this product... well, their user documentation is horrible, which means you must spend hours discovering almost everything on your own.

I like the RS300X for its ability to track and store training data. (But, finding the data is a hassle thanks to poor documentation with no examples. Ultimately, I will have to spend time creating a navigation chart myself.)

I like the chest band with its detachable transmitter and easy-to-replace battery.

I don't like the molded one-piece watch-band that forces you to wear the watch atop the wrist. I prefer to wear the watch on the side of my wrist where I can glance down to read, rather than having to raise my entire arm to read.

I still don't like the display because of its obnoxious glare and requirement of perfect up-close vision to read it.

Based on my experience with the RS300X and other Polar products, I would now raise my 2-star rating to 4-stars (if I could). Without excellent and useful documentation - that SAVES MY TIME & FRUSTRATION - I can't give it 5-stars.

All my other Polar products have been reliable and of high quality construction. I assume the RS300X will be the same or better.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sunday, September 6, 2009 11:25AM

I received my new Polar RS300X a couple days ago. I shoulda shopped around...

I've been using Polar Heart Rate monitors since 1986. and have been pleased with them all... Until now.

I bought this RS300X because I loathe the hassle of sending the equipment in for new batteries.

While the RS300X electronics seem to offer many features, the smaller display is utterly crappy - a significant obstruction to my workouts!

You must try to read the tiny display info through TWO glaring reflections off the clear plastic lens (glare NOT SHOWN in the photos). What good is the real-time feedback info if you can't read it while running?!?!

I assumed I would love this new product.

Unfortunately, after only two uses, I hate this RS300X. If I change my mind after more usage, I'll change this review.

Mike

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

View the original article here

Nathan Clip-On Deluxe L.E.D. Safety Strobe (Sports) recently tagged "running"

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

15 of 15 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Great Visibility, Small size, "Clippability", October 7, 2009 This review is from: Nathan Clip-On Deluxe L.E.D. Safety Strobe (Sports) The Nathan 5-LED safety light has bright LEDs. It has good visibility on the road, and all the different modes enables use in different scenarios.
You can have all LEDs ON or all LEDs blinking or One-at-a-time blinking (energy saving mode). With only one LED,s its still bright and visible, and the small time interval between blinking means that it would not be a risk to leave on this mode.
Runs on 2-AAA's included with the product, which is not mentioned in the product description. So no hassle trying to find the correct button cell.
It has a strong clip, which can be tagged to clothing, belt, bag, etc. But no attachment for seat-post. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Various strobe options, and it works, February 26, 2009 This review is from: Nathan Clip-On Deluxe L.E.D. Safety Strobe (Sports) Has various strobe options from which to pick, and it seems quite bright. I would say this makes it very effective. Gave it to my brother as a gift, who runs at night, and he hasn't been killed yet, so it must be working. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Nathan LED Light, July 12, 2008 This review is from: Nathan Clip-On Deluxe L.E.D. Safety Strobe (Sports) Great light with many strobing variations. Not as bright as some but bright enough for visibility at a great distance. Small and sturdy. I clip it to my bike or backpack when riding at night. I also keep it with me when going camping. Will buy a few more for an emergency travel kit. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 
Share your thoughts with other customers:    AdMost Recent Customer Reviews













View the original article here

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Timex Ironman Race Trainer Heart Rate Monitor Watch, Black/Grey (Sports) recently tagged "running"

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Great watch/HR monitor, January 21, 2010 I did some research prior to purchasing this HR monitor/watch. I have to say I am very pleased with it. I actually wanted one that measured distance, also, but they all seem to be too large for my wrist. This watch is fine and I honestly have a very small wrist. I like the features and especially the ability to review all of the info from each workout. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars Great HRM!, February 15, 2010 I both agree and disagree with some of the reviews for this product. Granted, I have only had it a week, so I can't speak about durability/quality. I also haven't used the interval or recovery modes (and may never).

First, it is comfortable! I forget that I am even wearing the chest strap and my wrist is light as air. I am a large framed female with a normal BMI and as another reviewer stated, I can wear it under my sports bra. It is also a nice looking watch. The HRM seems very accurate and that part wasn't difficult to set up if you know your numbers. Although I have to say, plan to spend a little time with the manual. While somewhat intuitive, you still need to familiarize yourself with the functions of the buttons in each mode. The only down side is the calorie counter. I don't know how these devices usually calculate this, but this one, as well the rest, always give reading higher than what is actual. But that is not a flaw of this HRM, but of all of them in general.

This is a great product! The only way they could make it better is to design it to be as accurate without needing the chest strap. Then I would wear it all the time!

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Does exactly what it says it will do!, January 24, 2010 I went through 2 other watches, having to return them because of size issues (too big), and this watch does what the review in Runner's World says it will do. I am a 6 ft 150 thin runner who got this size and it does not overwhelm my arm. The digits present well and the HRM feature works perfectly with a good connection. I don't even notice wearing the strap and the readings are pretty precise/clear, once you figure out how to click through the various reviews, recovery, etc features. It was a very nice Xmas gift from my wife and I can already see a few benefits or maybe just placebo benefits to how I am putting in the mileage now. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 
2115|R1SD4DDMBIH5G1;2115|R2N9BJGF4ACFR5;2115|R3C2O8T47TYCLV;Share your thoughts with other customers:    AdMost Recent Customer Reviews









View the original article here

Sennheiser Adidas CX 680 Sports Earbuds with Volume Control and Earfin Holding System (Electronics) recently tagged "running"

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 42 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Finally, a good earphone for sweaty runners, June 13, 2010 This review is from: Sennheiser Adidas CX 680 Sports Earbuds with Volume Control and Earfin Holding System (Electronics) I have been on a quest for a new pair of earphones for weeks. I have spent countless hours reading hundreds of reviews on various models. My main criteria (in order of importance) were: 1) Don't fall out when doing strenuous exercise like running, 2) Won't cease functioning or experience a decrease in functionality due to sweating (I sweat profusely when exercising, e.g., my clothes are normally drenched after an hour of cardio), 3) Comfort, 4) Price, 5) Sound quality, and 6) Appearance/Style.

Based on all that I read, I decided that the new Adidas-branded Sports line from Sennheiser might be the best option for me, so I splurged, got the CX680 at a big box store, and decided to test them since I knew I could return them for a full refund within 30 days if not satisfied. If I liked them I knew I could purchase online for 25-30% less. Note that I prefer the in-ear design, but was also considering the neckband design of the PMX680 as an alternate. However, I was hoping to find one pair that I could use for cardio, weightlifting, leisure, and travel.

First, I will explain what comes in the package. You get:

(1) SYMMETRICAL earphones with a 30" cord and a straight jack
(2) a 24" extender with a volume control on one end and an "L" jack on the other
(3) a Velcro carrying pouch
(4) 3 sets (S,M,L) of earfins, 1 set of M covers w/o fins, and 3 sets (S,M,L) of earbud covers
(5) a clip
(6) a cleaning tool

My assessment of each of these components:

(1) Short Cord: Used w/o the extender, the earphones are best worn using an armband (either arm is fine due to the symmetrical cord) with the cord clipped to the shirt on whatever side the armband is to reduce tension on the opposite side earbud. I ran for 1.5 hours last night with the cord clipped this way to the collar of a T-shirt. It stayed in place the entire time and was completely unobtrusive.

(2) Extender: The volume control is very light and can be clipped to the band of your shorts w/o adding noticeable weight. With my iPod Nano clipped to one side, the volume control on the other, and the cord beneath my shirt, there was some cord slack (I'm 5'8"), but the movement was not excessive and not disruptive. The wheel of the volume control has a slight resistance to it so that you won't mistakenly blast out your eardrums while adjusting it.

(3) Pouch: The pouch is good quality and roomy enough to hold the earbuds and a small music player. However, the cords do tend to become entangled easily.

(4) Earbuds/Earfins: With some trial and error I was able to find the right combination of fin and earbud that fit comfortably and didn't fall out with movement or sweat. I've had more difficulty finding the correct fit for my L ear, but even during a 1.5 hour run I only had to adjust the bud once b/c the fin had moved (Note that the earbud itself was still firmly sealed).

(5) Clip: As mentioned above, the clip work great when attached to a collar and probably would also with a hem. I tried to use it in the middle of my shirt and it simply fell off. There's a groove on the top that seemingly is supposed to hold the wire but it does not; you simply have to clip the wire along with the clothing.

(6) I have yet to use the cleaning tool.

Now on to how the CX680 ranks using my criteria.

(1) Fit & Staying Power, 5/5: These things stay put. I've had the stock earbuds which do not fit my ears well, fall out with movement or sweat, and sound crappy. I would imagine that most people should be able to find an earfin/earbud combination that fits them well. I like that this product is customizable rather than one-size-fits-all.

(2) Sweat Resistance, 5/5: More than any other pair of earbuds I've owned, these seem to be unaffected by sweating. They do not loosen when sweat is in the ears and their rubberized materials seem especially sweat "proof". I have not yet tried to put them in water. I would hope that these do not as easily succumb to the issues common with other earphones that seem less sturdy/durable. Even if they do fail at some point, at least with Sennheiser you have their 2 year warranty (another reason I chose these over something with only a 90 day warranty).

(3) Comfort, 5/5: I don't even notice I've wearing them.

(4) Price, 3/5: These certainly are not the cheapest earphones on the market, but they are new and will likely come down in price. The cheapest I've found is $70 online with free shipping. I would highly recommend buying them locally, seeing if they work for you, and then returning them and buying them for cheaper online. If you've got something that works for you now, I'd say wait for the price to drop on these. If money is no concern, just buy them!

(5) Sound quality, 3/5: I'm not an audiophile and I didn't get these b/c I wanted the best sounding buds, and they're not. I listen exclusively to electronic music and they're OK, but slightly lacking in bass. Not sure if "tinny" or "muddy" are the correct terms, but I've thought that my music sounded better with JBuds J2s (but they would fall out when I'd sweat and shorted out after a year), with Acoustibuds attached to stock earbuds (these sound great and actually stay pretty well during movement and sweating but they're bulky, have to be twisted into the ear canal, and it's challenging to find the sweet spot as far as the "best" position for maximum effect), or with over-the-head models (these offend my sense of fashion). The CX680s are not bad, just not the greatest sounding, but I'm willing to sacrifice on music quality to eliminate them moving around, falling out, or breaking b/c of sweat damage.

(6) Appearance, 4/5: I don't know why Sennheiser thinks it necessary to make their Sports lines in bright, obnoxious colors (neon green, orange, and now yellow), instead of more muted grays, blacks, or whites, but these are OK. I'm not using them to win any fashion contests, and they're more appealing, IMO, than the neckband, over-the-ears, or over-the-head models.

In summary, I give the CX680s a 4/5: They're great for what they're intended (i.e., reduction of slippage due to movement and/or sweat), but could sound better, be less expensive, and reduce the flashy factor. I would also have preferred an asymmetrical cord design so that the earphones could be used w/o the clip when using an armband. Before my 30 day "trial" period is over, I will be returning these to Big Box Store and purchasing them online. Hopefully they will prove to be a good investment and a solution to the annoyance of finding the best earphones for sweaty cardio freaks like me.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

36 of 40 people found the following review helpful: 2.0 out of 5 stars Fixes one issue but causes another, March 9, 2010 This review is from: Sennheiser Adidas CX 680 Sports Earbuds with Volume Control and Earfin Holding System (Electronics) I decided to upgrade to the CX680s after using a pair of CX380s for the last 6 months. The 380s were pretty good but didn't always stay in place during my workouts.

The good news with the CX680s is the ear fin technology works really well. They stay in place the whole time I'm at the gym. The bad news is Adidas/Sennheiser should have given more thought to the cord length. The standard cord is too short unless you're using an armband for your music player. Then it's too long so you have to wrap it around or have it move the whole time you're working out.

If you don't have an armband, then you have to use the extender with the inline volume control. When you do this the cord is way too long and it and the volume control bounce all over the place. You can use the included clip to keep one from moving but you can't stop both from moving. The moving is super distracting because you can hear it through the headphones and you don't know what the cord is going to get snagged on.

Having said all this, I guess these could work for you if you're the right height (I'm 5'10''). Height is important because the volume control also has a clip on it that you can use to keep it from flopping around. In my case, the clip didn't reach my waist so I couldn't clip it so it just dangled.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

10 of 11 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars workout headphones, March 20, 2010 This review is from: Sennheiser Adidas CX 680 Sports Earbuds with Volume Control and Earfin Holding System (Electronics) PROS: moisture resistant, excellent sound (after 'treble reducer' eq and removing earfins so they would fit correctly in my ear), great stability.

CONS: awkward cord lengths (comes w/ very long ext. cord, short primary cord), awkward earfins, initial sound quality presents with a bit much treble, tips slightly uncomfortable after a while in ear canals.

CONCLUSION: As workout headphones are concerned, compared to the Bose In-ear 'phones, Apple In-ears, my prev. fav. Sony MDR-EX85s, and even other Sennheisers I've tried, these offer far superior sound and functionality within the scope of exercise-specific headphones. I workout a lot (sweating substantially when doing so) and prefer clear bass; now that I have figured out not to use the earfin feature or bass boost (iPhone 3GS, iTouch 2G: these sound really BAD with boost on, the noise is amplified terribly) I wouldn't hesitate for a second to replace this pair with another of the same, were they to break.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 
Share your thoughts with other customers:    AdMost Recent Customer Reviews













View the original article here

Monday, March 21, 2011

Racquet Sports (Video Game) newly tagged "blu-ray"

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

13 of 13 people found the following review helpful: 3.0 out of 5 stars It's just OK, September 20, 2010 This review is from: Racquet Sports (Video Game) I'm not to happy with how the Move controls feel on the particular title. Seem a bit too "Wii" like to me and there are accuracy issues compared to any of the other Move products I purchased day one, Just think Wii and if you're OK with that performance, you'll be OK with this one. The characters look a bit Wii like too and the game mechanics are pretty bare minimum like most Wii games, you just swing vaguely in the right direction and you hit the ball. Not very realistic, hoping they do an update to this some time soon because the other sports games were lacking Tennis and Badminton which both me and the wifey love :) Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

10 of 11 people found the following review helpful: 3.0 out of 5 stars definitely fun, but somewhat lackluster graphics, September 17, 2010 This review is from: Racquet Sports (Video Game) The first thing I noticed when I popped this in was the detail in the playable characters. They're cartoony, but there's a lot of detail in their hair and faces. The second thing I noticed was some extremely distracting aliasing issues, which is also a big problem with PS2 and Wii games. Given the power of the PS3, I don't understand why this game isn't rendering in 1080p natively and/or doing an anti-aliasing pass like most other games do.

The audio is also pretty lackluster. Given the game comes on a bluray disc, and the PS3's built-in HD audio capabilities (and all PS3's have a hard drive), this is another "WTF?" moment.

The games are quite fun, though, and have a great feel. It's probable that folks not playing on a decent home theater system won't notice the lackluster graphics and audio issues as much as I did. As such, I still recommend this game!

I hope that when Ubisoft brings the Raving Rabbids, CSI, No More Heroes, Prince of Persia Trilogy, and Broken Sword games to PS3, they take more care to deliver a knockout HD audio and graphics experience that the other developers have already proven the PS3 to be more-than-capable of.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 

12 of 14 people found the following review helpful: 2.0 out of 5 stars Not a great implementation of the Playstation Move, September 19, 2010 This review is from: Racquet Sports (Video Game) Sports Champions set a high standard in showing the potential of the Playstation Move as a platform for amazingly realistic sports.

Unfortunately, Racquet Sports by Ubisoft falls short of this standard.

Racquet Sports was first released on the Wii in March. The premise sounded good--it allowed you to play Tennis, Ping Pong, Badminton, Squash, and Beach Tennis in different environments. The Wii version came with its own camera which sounded good in concept, but in reality was all but unusable. The camera didn't pick up your movements at all, and even when playing without the camera the responsiveness of the game wasn't even up to par with the original Wii Tennis.

I figured I'd give the Playstation Move version a shot. I figured with the improved camera and motion controls of the Move, maybe the developers would have more to work with. And since this was the first tennis games that would use the Move, Ubisoft had a great opportunity to set a new standard.

Unfortunately, this game had all the signs of one that was rushed out prematurely to hit the market.

On a positive note, the motion control detects the timing of your swings pretty well. This isn't saying much, of course, but if you're just looking for a game where you just smash the ball forward and back using timing only with no other skills or strategy, the game does the job there.

Also, the gameplay itself is fairly true to its respective racquet sports. You can learn the rules of squash, badminton, and beach tennis, and the on-screen response of the ball matches what you'd expect.

However, there are negatives with the game that made it a less-than-pleasant experience for me:

- Herky-jerky on-screen motion. With Sports Champions ping pong, the one-to-one correspondence between your hand movements and the on-screen paddle is nothing short of amazing--when you rotate your wrists, your on-screen paddle rotates just as smoothly. With Racquet Sports, when you rotate your wrists the animation of the on-screen racquet is awkward and jerky. It's something I expect on the Wii given its lower processor and graphics capabilities, but there's no excuse for it on the PS3.

- "Hipster" cartoony feel. With this game, you play with caricaturish cartoon characters that some designer tried too hard to make look "cool", complete with giant heads, black eye shadow, big toothy grins, spray-on tans, steroid-induced muscles, headbands, and short and tight-fitting outfits. They're the sort of characters that aren't endearing in the least--to the contrary you feel like punching them in the face. I know this is a matter of taste, but I much prefer the cute cartoony feeling of Wii Tennis or the photo-realistic look of Sports Champions ping-pong.

- Inaccurate controls. Whether on Beginner or Advanced level, I found that regardless of how I positioned my racquet or how strong my swing was, the ball would go where it wanted to go each time. There was no apparent way to put spin on the ball nor use arm movements to simulate lobs, smashes, or anything else other than a straight hit. So while every rally seemed long and "exciting", there really wasn't any skill involved. It's definitely a far cry from the precision that the Move is capable of.

To sum up, I'd classify this the first "shovelware" game for the Playstation Move. It seems to have been rushed to market to try to cash in on the introduction of the Move. This game may be your only option if you're a squash or badminton fan and don't mind the mindless controls. But if you're a ping pong fan, this title pales in comparison to Sports Champions. And if you're looking for great tennis on the PS3, I'd wait for a game like Virtual Tennis 4 or EA Sports' Tennis, both due out in 2011.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews Was this review helpful to you? 
Share your thoughts with other customers:    AdMost Recent Customer Reviews













View the original article here